Bart wrote:
"Eric Niebler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...snip...
I've regenerated the date_time docs locally and changed the Jamfile to
use BoostBook's support for multiple reference sections. The Jamfile was
broken because the two invocations of the boostbook rule we causing a
conflict, so I commented out "boostbook date_time_doc" invocation, which
seemed superflous. (Jeff, any guidance here?)
The patch is attached. If you'd like, I can commit this change along
with the regenerated docs. Jeff?
The next logical step would be to integrate this into the normal
documentation build progress so that we never have to worry again about
regenerating the date_time docs. Should be pretty trivial after this.
FYI, the only thing we'd have to do after this to integrate the
date_time docs fully into the doc build process is to add entries in
$BOOST_ROOT/doc/Jamfile.v2 pointing to libs/date_time/xmldoc/Jamfile.v2.
I have a question.
Can you generate the documentation in PDF format?
I tried, and just when it was about to finish, I got:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
And this was in spite of the fact that I had plenty of RAM to spare.
Ahh, Java. Gotta love it. So sadly, my answer is no, I can't generate
the PDF, but it has nothing to do with my changes, AFAIK.
--
Eric Niebler
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
