On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:36:00 -0800, Eric Niebler wrote > Looking at the nightly generated docs in the wake of my XSLT changes, > I notice that the date_time docs are out of step. Turns out for > date_time, Doxygen needs to be run as a separate step and the > resulting .boostbook files need to be checked in. Why is this not > integrated into the doc build process?
Sorry to be slow on the response. It's true, we generate the reference xml ourselves and check it in. The primary reason is getting a bit foggy for me now, but I believe the essential reason is the BoostBook isn't able to split the reference into parts. If you look at: http://www.boost.org/doc/html/date_time/doxy.html you'll see that we split things into 4 logical groupings. As far as I know there's no automated way to do this. As I recall there may be some other issues with the Doxygen results that we modify 'manually' (by script) as well... Anyway, I'll work on getting it in sync for the release. Jeff ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
