Bart wrote:
"Eric Niebler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...snip...
I've regenerated the date_time docs locally and changed the Jamfile to
use BoostBook's support for multiple reference sections. The Jamfile was
broken because the two invocations of the boostbook rule we causing a
conflict, so I commented out "boostbook date_time_doc" invocation, which
seemed superflous. (Jeff, any guidance here?)
The patch is attached. If you'd like, I can commit this change along
with the regenerated docs. Jeff?
The next logical step would be to integrate this into the normal
documentation build progress so that we never have to worry again about
regenerating the date_time docs. Should be pretty trivial after this.
I have a question.
Can you generate the documentation in PDF format?
Thanks Eric -- give me a day or two to look this over. I suspect it
won't be a problem, but since it seems like years since I looked at this
stuff I need a little time to setup an environment etc. Since we
maintain an independent date-time pdf file
(http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/libraries/date_time/date_time_1_33.pdf)
we want to be sure do that (hence Bart's question).
Jeff
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
