On Mar 22, 2006, at 1:53 AM, Eric Niebler wrote:
OK! I now know the magic XSL incantation to make this work. But I
notice there are already two different output styles supported by
function.xsl, toggled by the boost.generation.mode XSL parameter.
(The styles are "compact," the default ugliness with which you are
already familiar; and "standardese," a wholly different and
exciting form of ugliness.)
I was originally intending to use "standardese" mode to create
standalone proposals for the C++ LWG. I think I did it once, but a
bug in the XSLT caused more errors that wasted more time than ever :)
Is anybody setting boost.generation.mode? Why do we have it?
Grepping through the boost tree reveals nothing. The CVS history
shows that these modes were there from day 1. Would anybody object
if I just ripped all this complexity out?
Go for it.
Doug
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
