"Eric Niebler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ...snip... > > I've regenerated the date_time docs locally and changed the Jamfile to > use BoostBook's support for multiple reference sections. The Jamfile was > broken because the two invocations of the boostbook rule we causing a > conflict, so I commented out "boostbook date_time_doc" invocation, which > seemed superflous. (Jeff, any guidance here?) > > The patch is attached. If you'd like, I can commit this change along > with the regenerated docs. Jeff? > > The next logical step would be to integrate this into the normal > documentation build progress so that we never have to worry again about > regenerating the date_time docs. Should be pretty trivial after this. >
I have a question. Can you generate the documentation in PDF format? Bart ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
