William Ricker wrote:
> Or we could consider a change of policy to just allow posting (with same
> caveat of locality and relevance), thus avoiding the issue entirely. 

Practically speaking, the list isn't moderated, so any job poster who is 
conscientious enough to read the list policy and follow the directions 
of directly emailing a moderator, is probably going to follow criteria 
we post for what is acceptable. As long as we provide a contact person 
that posters can consult with on questionable items, self-moderation 
will probably be fine.

We could also ask Ron to indicate what percentage of job postings were 
rejected or required significant revision before being permitted.

I think the list and job traffic is low enough these days that it 
doesn't make sense to spend much time on gate keeping.

  -Tom

-- 
Tom Metro
Venture Logic, Newton, MA, USA
"Enterprise solutions through open source."
Professional Profile: http://tmetro.venturelogic.com/
 
_______________________________________________
Boston-pm mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm

Reply via email to