>I don't see how not shipping out of Alaska > >is going to solve problems. From what I read in the National Geographic > >site, they are actually taking a lot of care to ensure that such an accident > >doesn't happen again. This includes using three tugs to escorts all ships > >out past the rocks, with the tugs having enough power to overwhelm a ship's > >captain who would ground the ship. > > > How about preventing the ship from being grounded by keeping the captain > *sober*, which IIRC was a reported as a significant factor in the _Exxon > Valdez_ accident? > Yea, that's an obvious one. They issure sobrity tests on all captains before the ships leave port. But, the point of the tugs is really belt and suspenders. Even if the captain gets drunk while leaving port, the tugs should be powerful enough to overcome any stupid moves made by the ship. Dan M.
- Re: W. on the Environment Doug Pensinger
- Re: W. on the Environment Julia Thompson
- Re: W. on the Environment Marc Erickson
- Re: W. on the Environment Julia Thompson
- Re: W. on the Environment Kristin A. Ruhle
- Re: W. on the Environment Ronn Blankenship
- Re: W. on the Environment Doug Pensinger
- Re: W. on the Environment J. van Baardwijk
- Re: W. on the Environment L3 Dan Minette
- Re: W. on the Environment Ronn Blankenship
- Re: W. on the Environment Dan Minette
- Re: W. on the Environment Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
- Re: W. on the Environment Ronn Blankenship
- Re: car emissions standards Dan Minette
- Re: W. on the Environment Dan Minette
- Re: W. on the Environment Dan Minette
- Re: W. on the Environment Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
- Re: W. on the Environment Ronn Blankenship
- Re: W. on the Environment Dan Minette
- Re: W. on the Environment Ronn Blankenship
- Re: W. on the Environment Dan Minette
