At 10:00 PM 6/15/01, you wrote: >From: Dean Forster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Er, actually Dad just sat and read it, then thought > > about it. Then rinse and repeat. He passed on his > > stunningly complex method of analysis on to me. > > > >Would you argue that method of analysis is equally valid with scholarly >analysis? > >Dan M. If sincere prayer is involved in the first method, but not in the second, the first method would be more valid. -- Ronn! :)
- Re: 2nd Amendment Dean Forster
- Re: 2nd Amendment Dan Minette
- Re: 2nd Amendment Dean Forster
- Respect for the founders of the US Dan Minette
- Re: Respect for the founders of the US Marvin Long, Jr.
- Re: Respect for the founders of the US Dean Forster
- Re: Respect for the founders of the US Gautam Mukunda
- Re: Respect for the founders of the US Dan Minette
- Re: Respect for the founders of the US Gautam Mukunda
- Analysis techniques Dan Minette
- Re: Analysis techniques Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Analysis techniques Dean Forster
- Re: Analysis techniques Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Analysis techniques Dean Forster
- Re: Analysis techniques Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Analysis techniques Dean Forster
- Re: Analysis techniques Dan Minette
- Re: 2nd Amendment Ronn Blankenship
- Re: 2nd Amendment John D. Giorgis
- Re: 2nd Amendment Marc Erickson
- Re: FBI data Dan Minette
