--- Ronn Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 10:00 PM 6/15/01, you wrote: > >From: Dean Forster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > Er, actually Dad just sat and read it, then > thought > > > about it. Then rinse and repeat. He passed on > his > > > stunningly complex method of analysis on to me. > > > > > > >Would you argue that method of analysis is equally > valid with scholarly > >analysis? > > > >Dan M. > > > If sincere prayer is involved in the first method, > but not in the second, > the first method would be more valid. > > > -- Ronn! :) > > :: waves a 10' pole at both of you :: dean __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more. http://buzz.yahoo.com/
- Re: 2nd Amendment Dan Minette
- Re: 2nd Amendment Dean Forster
- Respect for the founders of the US Dan Minette
- Re: Respect for the founders of the US Marvin Long, Jr.
- Re: Respect for the founders of the US Dean Forster
- Re: Respect for the founders of the US Gautam Mukunda
- Re: Respect for the founders of the US Dan Minette
- Re: Respect for the founders of the US Gautam Mukunda
- Analysis techniques Dan Minette
- Re: Analysis techniques Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Analysis techniques Dean Forster
- Re: Analysis techniques Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Analysis techniques Dean Forster
- Re: Analysis techniques Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Analysis techniques Dean Forster
- Re: Analysis techniques Dan Minette
- Re: 2nd Amendment Ronn Blankenship
- Re: 2nd Amendment John D. Giorgis
- Re: 2nd Amendment Marc Erickson
- Re: FBI data Dan Minette
- Re: FBI data Dean Forster
