On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 01:29:01PM +0200, J. van Baardwijk wrote:
> Say WHAT??? No what in the world gave you that absolutely wrong
> idea? In my 34 years in this life, I've watched countless programs
> and read numerous newspaper and magazine articles about it, visited
> websites of various environmentalist organisations, and talked to many
> environmentalists (and became one myself). But NOT A SINGLE ONE of
> these sources ever claimed that nuclear energy is green -- they all
> claimed exactly the opposite.
>
> Then you come along and claim nuclear energy is green. Now who do
> you think will be more credible: the entire collection of programs,
> articles, environmentalist groups and individual environmentalists, or
> a single individual who, of all places, works in the oil business --
> the one business that has a lot to lose?
Umm, that's an easy question. Dan is much more credible. He posts
well-researched articles with logical arguments that are scientifically
sound and gives references to credible sources. Many of the others that
you mention post emotional diatribes that clearly show they do not
understand or care about the math, science, and engineering details, and
have dubious (or non-existant) references.
--
"Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.com/
