On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 12:04:02PM +0200, J. van Baardwijk wrote:
> OK, mr. Genius, you got some explaining to do.

No, I don't think I do. You asked which was more credible, I
answered. If you want to change that, then CITE SOME CREDIBLE SOURCES.

> 1. I mentioned that NONE of those
> documentaries/articles/groups/individuals ever claimed that nuclear
> power is green. You then reply that many of them "post emotional
> diatribes" and don't know what they're talking about, and even explain
> that "many" means "some largish subset". In other words: some of
> them (total group minus the largish subset) apparently DO NOT post
> emotional diatribes, and actually do know what they are talking about.

No, I didn't say that. I have never seen any credible articles
explaining that nuclear power is not green. But I haven't seen all
of the articles. Therefore I cannot reasonably say that all of them
post uncredible articles, and so I say "many" because I have seen many
uncredible ones. If you claim there are credible ones, then CITE SOME
CREDIBLE SOURCES.

> 2. Define "many" as used by you in "many of the others". How large is that 
> "largish subset"? Is it 50% of the entire group? Or 75%? Or perhaps even 
> 99.9%? Please provide the data to back up that claim.

You first. CITE SOME CREDIBLE SOURCES.

> Not that it makes much difference whether it's 90% or 10% -- it isn't
> any less insulting to a large group of people. I can imagine that a
> journalist (someone TRAINED and PAID to report FACTS) would consider
> it quite insulting to be told "you have a 10% probability of being a
> liar".

If they feel insulted when they don't write a good article, then maybe
they will be compelled to CITE SOME CREDIBLE SOURCES.

> 3. Can you provide of list of the documentaries and articles that came out 
> in the last 3 decades that gave false information about nuclear energy? Can 
> you point out to us which individual journalists and environmentalists we 
> can or can't trust? You sound so sure of yourself in your semi-blanket 
> statement that you must have very detailed information about this.

Can you CITE SOME CREDIBLE SOURCES?


-- 
"Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>       http://www.erikreuter.com/

Reply via email to