"Adam C. Lipscomb" wrote: > > Jeffrey wrote: > > Its not a matter of liking or not liking Dan's posts - its a matter of > > chiming in with a thought or comment and having someone send back a 15kb > > email detailing why I'm an idiot that I have a problem with. > > I don't get a feeling of that from Dan's posts at all. Yes, Dan is *very* > into backing himself up seven ways to Sunday, but he doesn't seem to me to > be doing that to make anyone look like an idiot. It's just the way he is. > If that ain't your bag, then don't debate him.
I'm overly sensitive to the implication of stupidity and the use of "intellegence" to intimidate, for various reasons that would make for a rather bland, ordinary sort of "Behind the Music" episode (which is why I hesitate to take part in the "who we are" thread). I've tried to apologize to Dan for not giving him the benefit of the doubt already and got nothing, so here it is a second time. -j- -- moo.
