----- Original Message -----
From: "Marvin Long, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brin-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: Spider-Man, Spider-Man...



> >
> > s
> >
> > p
> >
> > o
> >
> > i
> >
> > l
> >
> > e
> >
> > r
> >
> >
> >
> > s
> >
> > p
> >
> > a
> >
> > c
> >
> > e
> >
> > I had a little problem with the organic webshooter.  Why make that
change?
> > It doesn't have much of an impact on the plot, I just don't get it.  And
> > part of the coolness of Peter Parker in the comic books is that he is
> > technologically savvy enought to build things like a webshooter.  It's
also
> > fun to see him occasionally run out of web fluid and have to improvise
> > heavily...
> >
> > Those problems aside, I liked it a lot overall, and I'm sure I'll pick
it up
> > on DVD when it becomes available.
>
> I pretty much agree with all this; on the other hand, I'd still give it a
> 9.5 because they did a beautiful job of collapsing nearly -- what, a
> decade? -- of Goblin arc into one movie.  The organic web shooters are
> silly, IMO, but my understanding is that Raimi just loved the idea for
> some reason.  Maybe it's because it's really hard to strap mechanical
> web-shooters on a real human being's arm without making them look stupid.
> If you look at the comics, Spidey's web-shooters must be based on nanotech
> or something because they take up literally no space at all on his wrists.
>
> And the ending, where Parker breaks MJ's heart...that was done *so* well,
> I could hardly believe it.

Actually, he didn't break her heart for long.  Her heart was broken for
about 30 seconds before she got a clue about what he was really doing.

I particularly liked the fact that it was a moral drama, reminicent of the
discussions between Hal Mayne and Bleys Ahrens in the Childe cycle by Gordon
R. Dickson.  I also like the fact that the Peter and MJ's love story was
fairly well done: the foundation of their relationship is that they actually
like each other as people.

Dan M.


Reply via email to