> > > > s > > > > p > > > > o > > > > i > > > > l > > > > e > > > > r > > > > > > > > s > > > > p > > > > a > > > > c > > > > e > > Actually, he didn't break her heart for long. Her heart was broken for about 30 seconds before she got a clue about what he was really doing.
I particularly liked the fact that it was a moral drama, reminicent of the discussions between Hal Mayne and Bleys Ahrens in the Childe cycle by Gordon R. Dickson. I also like the fact that the Peter and MJ's love story was fairly well done: the foundation of their relationship is that they actually like each other as people. Dan M. Me: Well, Dunst herself has said that her interpretation of that moment is that she knew who he was. I would strike a slightly discordant note in that, while I thought it was good, it wasn't nearly as good as I was expecting. I never read comics growing up, so you couldn't call me a fan, but I was struck by: 1. Norman Osborn's relationship with Peter really wasn't that deep - so this "I've been like a father to you" thing didn't make any sense, nor Peter's depression at his death. 2. On what planet is the richest kid in a public school _not_ one of the popular kids? In which is he ignored by the prettiest girl in school? 3. If they had really played out the Gwen Stacy storyline - where Peter _did_ have to make a choice, and lost his girlfriend because of it, that would have been amazing. As it is, the dropping two things at once was, first, _way_ too reminiscent of Batman Forever and, second, obviated the moral dilemma that Peter was facing, and that could have made it a really good movie, instead of just an entertaining one. Gautam
