> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Reuter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 05:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Sexually explicit materials, censorship, and strawmen.
>
>
> On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 05:09:15PM -0700, Nick Arnett wrote:
>
> > It's not censorship if *we* decide what is appropriate to this list.
>
> Of course it is censorship. It may be voted on or agreed upon
> censorship, but it is censorship nonetheless. If it is
> decided by any other way than unanimous consent, it is a
> censorship by the tyranny of the majority. It is certainly
> legal in this case, but that doesn't make it moral or desirable.
It could also be concensus - lack of unanimity does not a tyranny make.
-j-
