----- Original Message ----- From: "The Fool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 5:08 PM Subject: Re: Efficiency in Genocide
> > From: Andrew Crystall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > On 30 Jun 2002 at 14:32, The Fool wrote: > > > > > > From: Andrew Crystall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > On 29 Jun 2002 at 22:47, The Fool wrote: > > > > > > > > > The problem is you can fit every single person in the world > > > > > (~6,000,000,000) in approximately half the state of Texas. > Giving > > > > > each the space of about 30ft x 30ft. Before you realize that > > > > > people live in families, marriages / children etcetera which > > > > > reduces the Total area drastically. Before you also realize the > > > > > people can live above one another in apartments and high-rise > > > > > skyscrapers. > > > > > > > > Standard of living. Biosphere. > > > > > > > > > Those environmental extremists are FULL OF SHIT. > > > > > > > > No, YOU are. > > > > > > Prove to me that the entire farmland of the U.S. can't feed a > > > population 10x as big as the 6b now living. > > > > > > Prove to me that 60b people can't fit on the earth. > > > > > > Prove to me that 99% of all human waste can't be recycled. > > > > > > Prove to me that the Sun can't provide 100% of all energy needs for a > > > 60b population. > > > > No, the burden of proof on statements like that is ON YOU. If you > > want to SPECULATE, because that is what you're doing, on future > > technology, then you must prove the viability of these things. > > So what you are saying is that you can't or won't back up your statements > about world population / etcetera in any way with any data, and are > calling for massive genocide, along the lines the holocaust. > > > I can only apply the criteria we have with MODERN technology, and > > what can reasonable be extrapoltaed in the next few years. I CANNOT > > stake the Human race on possible developments in technology. > > > > You're playing with what if's. So that's ours - WHAT IF we DON'T make > > those breakthroughs? WHAT IF we can't look beyond the next few years, > > and end up in a trap? > > You are playing with what ifs. > > > I prefer to look forwards. To use, as we say.. "Today's techologies, > > today's soloutions". To present a solotion to every problem rather > > than just the problem as the Greeners do. You're lumping us all > > together. > > In what way can't *todays* technologies do any of those things I listed? > > > I lump you together too, true. I call you "Dangers to the Human > > Race". > > You are the real danger to the human race. You are a cancer, just like > the Taliban and the authoritarian dictators who killed hundreds of > millions in the past century. > > > > > Understand that I am Eco Realist (or Eco Nazi to the greens), not a > > > > tree hugging backwards-looking utterly unrealistic Greener. > > > > > > > > But statements like your prove that you don't get the issues, are > > > > basically uninformed and are a good reason why this list has gone > to > > > > hell. > > > > > > You are an idiot. > > > > I suggest you take a hard look at the facts. Not extrapolation which > > goes FAR beyond the current facts. You are THIS || close to every > > single one of your posts going in the trashcan. > > I look at facts. Where are your facts? > > > And bringing a lot nearer the day I unsubscribe from Brin-L for good, > > because the list is pushing that way. > > And sounding just like that Kirsten person just before she went. > Ok you two.....cool it a bit please. This is a ding! And this is my Dinging Stick! Its made from an elephants cock. Nobody wants to be dinged with an slobbery old elephants crank! I really dont want to pick it up but no one seems to know the location of the old "wand of dinging", so it will have to do. Dont make me touch that thang or I will get testy! <G> xponent Walk Softly And Carry A Big Prick Maru [Sense Of Humor Airlines] rob
