Steve Sloan II wrote:
>
> vze3xykq wrote:
>
> > Now there's a new twist. How, exactly, did Ken Lay bilk
> > his employees?
> >
> > Kevin T.
> > Should I start naming the ways you're wrong now,
>
> It wouldn't be the first time I've been that wrong. ;-)
>
> > or let you reply?
>
> I was too specific in that email. I just picked Ken Lay's name
> out of the air (or possibly some part of my anatomy ;-) ), but
> I think my point is still valid. I see the most vocal moralists
> as being way more concerned about sexual morality, which usually
> hurts no one, and not nearly as concerned about bigger issues
> of fairness, like the big guy screwing over the little guy.
"Screwing over?" "Screwing" can have a sexual meaning. So it all goes
back to the sexual morality. :)
OK, maybe not, but I couldn't resist.
(Today is going better than yesterday, but there's still the residual
pain from the highlight of my day yesterday, the hour spent in the
dental chair. And I'm not kidding about it being the highlight, either
-- all I had to do was lie back and let someone do weird things to my
mouth, starting with numbing it so I wouldn't feel any pain there while
he did it. No decisions to make, no scheduling issues *I* had to worry
about, which was a very refreshing change, actually. But now part of my
mouth is bothering me a bit.)
Julia
