Jeroen wrote:
>
>> I think you should take this as a compliment. If we
>> ask _reason_ to one party, and ignore the other,
>> it's because we think one side _can_ change.
>
> That is not how I see it. I see myself (the victim
> of Erik's attack) being attacked for defending myself,
> and at the same time see Erik's misbehaviour
> being approved of.
>
That might be the case two or three weeks ago. But
since I rejoined the list, I only watched you posting
with increasing anger, and Erik making fun of your
anger.
>
> At the same time, there will probably be plenty of
> consensus about banning *me*.
>
Maybe - because you began spamming the list with
the same repeated message.
> My fellow listowners *are* considering that, you know.
>
No, I don't know.
>> Do you propose any *real* solution to this problem?
>
> Other than letting him provide the proof and answers
> to a judge instead of letting him provide the proof
> and answers to me?
>
I think it should be obvious that he will not provide
any proof to anything.
>
>> BTW, AFAIK it's not Erik alone who is poking fun on
>> you about this discussion...
>
> Oh no, there is no doubt in my mind that plenty of
> people are enjoying the current round of
> Jeroen-bashing. :-(
>
This I learned from my teenage years: the guys who became
more sensitive about being bashed were the ones who were
most bashed. It seems that we are a group of teenagers :-)
Alberto Monteiro
