On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 10:48:48PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:07 PM > Subject: Re: Demanding change (was RE: Mmm, mesquite smoky goodness (was > Re: (~) Please.)) > > > > > There's that straw man again. Who among us has said that one cannot > > > post something that upsets the majority? > > > > There's that faulty memory again. Just look back to the thread where a > > number of people advocated banning Mark; before that, there was talk > > about kicking off JDG; before that, Alberto. > > Actually, that's faulty memory and logic. :-) First, with JDG and Alberto, > the campaign to knock them off was _singular_. That's the memory part.
Actually, that's faulty reading comprehension, Dan. Or do you claim Jeroen is not a "who among us" and he didn't talk (write) about kicking off JDG & Alberto? > The logical fallacy here is > > If there are things that offend the majority that cannot be done, > > then > > one cannot offend the majority. You have confused Nick's question with, "Who among us has said that one can NEVER post something that upsets the majority". > My class in symbolic logic was over 25 years ago, but I still remember > a bit. How about English class? -- "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.net/
