On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 01:12:44PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote: > With Alberto, it was definately a rules thing, as he stated. It had > nothing to do with upsetting the majority.
The "rules" are supposedly the will of the majority, are they not? And why do they exist, if not because some people think the list needs protection from something. Upset would be a fair description of what they would say the list needs protection against. Also, you didn't argue against my third example. Even if we leave out the other two, my third example is sufficient evidence. -- "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.net/
