> -----Original Message-----
> From: J. van Baardwijk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:26 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Demanding change (was RE: Mmm, mesquite smoky 
> goodness (was Re: (~) Please.))
> 
> 
> At 00:27 17-07-2002 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote:
> 
> <snip post>
> 
> Why are you wasting your time, posting here? You should be 
> working on a 
> message in which you back your claims with hard evidence and 
> answer my 
> questions.
> 
> 
> I STILL WANT THE EVIDENCE FOR YOUR CLAIMS, AND I STILL WANT ANSWERS.
> 
> 
> Jeroen "I warned you this would happen" van Baardwijk

Without passing judgement on the merits of your claim against Erik, I thought I'd 
start a meta-thread about the recent issue by pointing out a few of the list 
guidelines I think you're breaking in your pursuit of this issue.

As members of a civilization, these are the guidelines we agree to live under:
 - We post as if every message we write as if we were going to read it aloud in front 
of the whole group. 
 - We DO include a few lines if our reply can't stand on its own. 
 - If our reply is more appropriately directed only at the original poster, we don't 
send it to the entire list. 

We further agree that:
 - Abusive or inflammatory language is not welcome. 
 - Chain letters are not welcome. 
 - Mail bombs to each other are not welcome. 
 - The Listowners have the right to remove someone who does not wish to comport 
themselves in a manner concordant with our civilization. 

-j-

Reply via email to