----- Original Message ----- From: "Miller, Jeffrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 1:39 PM Subject: Let's Check The Rules, Shall We? (was RE: Demanding change (was RE: Mmm, mesquite smoky goodness (was Re: (~) Please.)))
> > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: J. van Baardwijk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:26 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Demanding change (was RE: Mmm, mesquite smoky > > goodness (was Re: (~) Please.)) > > > > > > At 00:27 17-07-2002 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote: > > > > <snip post> > > > > Why are you wasting your time, posting here? You should be > > working on a > > message in which you back your claims with hard evidence and > > answer my > > questions. > > > > > > I STILL WANT THE EVIDENCE FOR YOUR CLAIMS, AND I STILL WANT ANSWERS. > > > > > > Jeroen "I warned you this would happen" van Baardwijk > > Without passing judgement on the merits of your claim against Erik, I thought I'd start a meta-thread about the recent issue by pointing out a few of the list guidelines I think you're breaking in your pursuit of this issue. > > As members of a civilization, these are the guidelines we agree to live under: > - We post as if every message we write as if we were going to read it aloud in front of the whole group. > - We DO include a few lines if our reply can't stand on its own. > - If our reply is more appropriately directed only at the original poster, we don't send it to the entire list. > > We further agree that: > - Abusive or inflammatory language is not welcome. > - Chain letters are not welcome. > - Mail bombs to each other are not welcome. > - The Listowners have the right to remove someone who does not wish to comport themselves in a manner concordant with our civilization. > > -j- > Then let us kick him from the list and go on our merry way. I for one want this to end. xponent Lets End It Maru rob
