Erik Reuter wrote: > >I think it has worked well in the past. Perhaps there wasn't sufficient >reason to take action so far? > You must be kidding. The list has become a virtual train wreck. Some conflict and confrontation is to be expected, but when it dominates the list the wheels have fallen off. IMO of course.
>Therefore, a compromise occurs to me. Why not have *BOTH* a filtered and >non-filtered list. brin-l-f would be filtered in whatever way a group >of like-minded people think best (or you could even have brin-l-f1, >brin-l-f2, etc.), while brin-l would be unfiltered. People can subscribe >to whatever list they like. In case that wasn't clear, another way of >saying it is that the messages in brin-l-f would be a subset of the >messages in brin-l, and brin-l would be a superset of brin-l-f. > That's cool with me. I hereby nominate you to set up the unfiltered one. 8^) Doug
