On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > One still needs to consider whether the off-list activity would constitute > an offense. FREX, sending messages off-list because one is not allowed to > post on-list would not necessarily be an offense (IMO, that would depend > more on the content than on the delivery method); it can also be considered > a perfectly justified way to circumvent the blocking. > > As for "forging headers" by changing the Reply-To address, I don't consider > that an offense; the return address is clearly visible in the "From:" field > of the incoming message as well as in the "To:" field of the reply, so the > recipient can easily see where his reply will be sent. It may not be *nice* > to change the Reply-To address, but it does not qualify as an offense.
Thank goodness for flexible mail filters, then. Marvin Long Austin, Texas Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Poindexter & Ashcroft, LLP (Formerly the USA) _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
