On 24 Jan 2003 at 5:51, Kevin Tarr wrote: > At 05:01 AM 1/24/2003 +0000, you wrote: > >On 23 Jan 2003 at 19:33, Deborah Harrell wrote: > > > > > http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/science/01/10/denmark.environment.ap/ > > > > > > "In his 2001 book, "The Skeptical Environmentalist," > > > Danish statistician Bjoern Lomborg said concerns about > > > melting ice caps, deforestation, acid rain were > > > exaggerated. He claimed that the global environmental > > > situation was not deteriorating. > > > > > > The book was translated into a dozen languages and > > > generated criticism from environmentalists worldwide. > > > > > > The Danish Committees on Scientific Dishonesty said > > > Tuesday that the 350-page book "is clearly in > > > violation of the norms for good scientific behavior." > > > >..precisely what I said on the list during ye great debate and was > >flamed off the list for several months for doing so. > > > >Told. You. So. > > > >*bows* > > > >Andy > > > You told us? Told us what? That you believe that scientific inquiry > should be based on behavior and not facts? That a Committee can pass > judgement on a book without disproving any facts in that book? That > someone who has a dissenting view shouldn't have a voice? > > Yeah, you told us. Told us about yourself and your beliefs.
No. I TOLD you he was no scientist. That he was a activist for a cause. I TOLD you that there were LEGITIMATE CONCERNS with the way he used data. I TOLD you that his work was NOT sufficiently peer-reviewed. Don't worry, I'll take myself off the list since I must be a moron for daring to hold enviromental beliefs. $fuckmethen. Bye. Andy Dawn Falcon _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
