On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 12:24:41PM -0000, Andrew Crystall wrote: > No. I TOLD you he was no scientist. That he was a activist for a > cause. > > I TOLD you that there were LEGITIMATE CONCERNS with the way he used > data. > > I TOLD you that his work was NOT sufficiently peer-reviewed.
How about a little less TELLING and a lot more DEMONSTRATING or PROVING? You'll have to forgive us for preferring, on one hand -- a 350 page book full of numbers and point by point rational arguments with supporting evidence and references -- over your blustering and TELLING. > I must be a moron for daring to hold enviromental beliefs. That doesn't follow, but I think it would be fair to say that you must be unscientific for failing to scientifically debate your beliefs. -- "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.net/ _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
