On 24 Jan 2003 at 9:27, Erik Reuter wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 02:20:58PM -0000, Andrew Crystall wrote:
> > I simply don't have the time, sorry. Or the inclination to go over
> > ground which would covered far better by an environmental scientist.
> > Which I am not, even if I do have access to a large archive of data.
> 
> Translation:
> 
> 1) Either you
> 
>   (a) don't consider the issue important enough to research it and
>   debate it in a scientific manner, or
> 
>   (b) you don't think your claims could stand up to such scrutiny
> 
> 2) You either don't have access to scientific research on which to
> base your claims, or you do have access but are unwilling to use that
> access, possibly because of 1(a)?
> 
> 3) You say you are not an environmental scientist and imply here and
> in earlier emails that anyone who is not an environmental scientist
> lacks credibility in this area, but you refuse to cite point-by-point
> refutations of Lomborg's conclusions done by an environmental
> scientist
> 
> 
> And yet we should listen when you bluster and TELL us that Lomborg's
> book of carefully presented data, rational point-by-point arguments,
> and many references, is all wrong?
> 
> As you say, excuse me?

I said, I DON'T HAVE THE TIME OR THE INCLINATION.

That is precisely it. No hidden motives. No "I don't think I can do 
it". No "I don't think it's important". No "I don't think I know what 
I'd be arguing".

Part of the problem with time is that I couldn't use my usual source, 
and while I have the access via Athens (JANET) to science direct and 
similar, I'd have to look my references up and not all of them are 
public access.

I have work due in at several points over the next few weeks. I'm 
waiting on some results I need now or I wouldn't have time to write E-
mails.

And I'm not saying it's wrong. A panel of SCIENTISTS has. To that 
matter, a I feel a good few of his conclusions are right. But not a 
majority of them.

Translation what what you said in similar manner: You're 
enviromentalist. You suck. You're going to hell.

Happy now?
Dawn Falcon

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to