--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Miller, Jeffrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >You're right - we pulled out of the treaty before violating it, so >technically..
BTW - the ABM Treaty specifically provided for a method of withdrawal by either party through ample notification, which the US followed to the letter. > > What UN Security Council > > Resolution is the US not merely interpreting differently than > > others, but actually violating? > > Oh right, I forgot - since we figured we couldn't get a vote, we > just wouldn't bother, and instead violate the UN Charter.. Ahem, UNSC Resolution 678 authorized "all necessary means" to enforce "all previous and subsequent resolutions" regarding Iraq. UNSC Resolution 1441 went to great lengths to specifically state that it was *subsequent* to 678. Is interpreting the above to provide for war as a "necessary means" to gain Iraq compliance with resolutions 687 and 1441 so beyond the pale? JDG _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
