> From: Robert Seeberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > From: "The Fool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I said: > > > > And I said nothing about criticism. > > > Its namecalling I object to. > > > > > > I have no objection in any way to you or anyone else jumping into the > > fray. > > > But if you feel obligated to insult someone, do it with some style, > > make it > > > interesting. > > > If one is to embark on a course of psychic violence with an opponent, > > does > > > one expect that a buffet of limp wristed bitch slapping that any > > > prepubescent pud puller might find to be high art will be as > > satisfying to > > > ones list-peers? > > > Think about it. > > > There are some brilliant people on this list. > > > Here, calling another a hypocrite, and leaving it at that, simple and > > > unadorned, shows a lack of appreciation for the minds of your fellow > > > list-members. *I* am not pleased that *I* am so easily discounted by > > one, > > > who when he speaks for himself, fails to make an impression one way or > > the > > > other. > > > > No I just think catholics are hyprocritical. They profess to follow > > christ, but it is mary for whom they worship. They profess to adhere to > > the bible (even quoting it sometimes), but it is the pope they obey, and > > the bible they discount. > > That is the second consecutive time you have responded with something that > had nothing to do with anything I said. > That is an odd fixation you have. > > You have singularly strong and specific religious beliefs for an atheist. > It really throws your previous anti-religion postings into sharp relief. > And perhaps into comic relief: > > A person who denies the existence of God and then tries to preach on the > meaning of the word of God.
If somebody is going to spout a gibberish 'trvth' they had better be consistent. Most religious people aren't consistent. And their trvth is usually anti-intellectual, anti-science. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
