> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Bryon Daly > Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 2:14 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: The Case for a Marriage Ammendment to the Constitution > > >From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 12:11:59AM -0400, John D. Giorgis wrote: > > > > > I disagree. Since every child is produced by a mother and a father, > > > I think that our ideal goal should be to place every child up for > > > adoption with a very good mother and father. > > > >I disagree. Catholics have a distorted view of the world that isn't > >healthy to pass on to children. They should not be permitted to legally > >marry, and their children should be put up for adoption with decent > >parents. > > I know you're trying to troll him, but 1) he never stated anything about > Catholicism is his remark, did that need to be dragged in?, and 2) it's > intolerant and offensive to me and perhaps to any other Catholics who > might > be on this list.
It IS offensive, I agree. But the point he's making is, imo a valid one, even if it could have been made with more tact. Bryon, reread the paragraph but substitute the word "homosexual" for "Catholic". Do you still think it's offensive? Why or why not? Jon Le Blog: http://zarq.livejournal.com _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
