On 1 Nov 2003 at 20:28, William T Goodall wrote: > So Andrew starts by giving a (mistaken) definition of religion. Then > he implicitly uses a different definition of religion later in his > rant. > > Hence it is a non sequitur. > > And hence it is a non sequitur.
I meant it *precisely* how I said it. You'd have to be utterly devoted to your own mnarrow view of life, bound by a ironclad doctine which allows no view outside your own little window. Oh wait... It's only a non sequitur if you can't accept reality. Andy Dawn Falcon _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
