----------
> From: Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> The Fool wrote:
> > 
> > ----------
> > From: iaamoac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> > Well, I happen to know that there are a number of critiques of Bush's
> > foreign policy on this List.   Thus, I thought that it would be
> > interesting to solicit recommendations for what to do about Iran
> > here.   I look forward to your thoughts.
> > 
> > Here is a summary of the current situation:
> > 
> >   http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110005213
> > 
> > For the record, here's a sample of what the latest IAEA report says:
> > 
> > � "The information provided to date by Iran has not been adequate" to
> > explain the origin of traces of near-weapons-grade uranium found by
> > inspectors.
> > 
> > � "Important information about the P-2 centrifuge [uranium
> > enrichment] program has frequently required repeated requests, and in
> > some cases continues to involve changing or contradictory
> > information"; and
> > 
> > � "Iran's postponement until mid-April of the visits originally
> > scheduled for mid-March . . . resulted in a delay in the taking of
> > environmental sample and their analysis."
> > 
> > ----
> > Simple.  We send in the stealth Bombers / Fighters and bomb every
single
> > suspected nuclear site with daisy cutters.  It's the right thing to
do.
> > Shrub is too cowardly and ignorant to the right thing.
> 
> Would Israel do "the right thing"?

They did the right thing with Iraq's Nuclear Reactor.  But it's a more
sticky situation when Israel does things, because it'd likely start
another Arab-Israel war.

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to