> Andrew Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Deborah Harrell wrote:
<snippage> > > > As others have pointed out, he _is_ calling for > > > action > > > WRT Darfur, which is laudable. From what I've > > > learned, it is not possible for the US alone to > > > intervene there militarily, as our forces are > > > stretched too far elsewhere.* > To use an argument style that really peed me off, > does this inability to > intervene in Darfur because the US is stretched out > in Iraq, mean that > support for the Iraq war is functionally, tacit > approval of the slaughter in Darfur? <blinks> Huh, I hadn't actually reached or intended to imply that conclusion, FWIW... <snippy dig> That tactic has been used by others, however. Debbi *But Perhaps Those Who Think We Could Effectively Intervene 'Cause It Wouldn't Be All-Out War Are Correct Maru __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
