At 06:00 PM Wednesday 12/5/2007, Charlie Bell wrote:

>On 06/12/2007, at 3:05 AM, Nick Arnett wrote:
> >
> > I'm also a committed Christian and there's nothing incompatible
> > about the
> > two.
>
>Except insofar as Christianity makes claims about how the world is.
>IIRC, you're a Lutheran, and the American Lutheran church is fairly
>progressive. But saying there's *nothing* incompatible about the two
>would seem to be a stretch - even if you subscribe to the viewpoint of
>"non-overlapping magisteria" there are bound to be cases where you
>simply have to make a value judgement between what your religion tells
>you and how the world appears to actually be, no?
>
> >  My church and lots of others around here are full of scientists and
> > engineers -- this is Silicon Valley, after all. Some may find that
> > their
> > beliefs and their science collide, but I assure you that most don't.
>
>Because they genuinely don't collide at all, or because of
>compartmentalisation?


The usual answer in practice to that question:

If »—› I ‹—« do it, it's because they genuinely don't collide.

If »—› you ‹—« do it, it's because of 
"compartmentalization" (aided perhaps by 
"rationalization" and/or "self-delusion").  ;)


-- Ronn! :)

"People who want to share their religious views 
with you almost never want you to share yours with them."
-- Dave Barry



_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to