I think Rob makes some good points and I would support his suggestion.
However the point I'd like to make is that whatever we choose, it should be consistent and decisions like this should be more transparent. The first I saw that only 11 teams would qualify from Tour Zero was when inspecting the schedule; the 11th vs. 12th game was described as a 'qualifier playoff' (or some such similar). Perhaps there would be less resentment / backlash at such proposals if people were made completely clear of the situation before the event. The Nationals / EUCS Qualifier debate would be another example. D. On 03/04/07, Oscar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm confused. On 03/04/07, Robert Alpen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not proposing being swamped by European team, just one team/tour.
> --- Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Adam Batchelor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 2:52 PM > > Subject: [BD] Re: Tour 0 > > > > "There is an Austrian team The BigEz looking to > > enter the first A tour. > > > > Well whoot de doot!
__________________________________________________ BritDisc mailing list [email protected] http://fysh.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/britdisc Staying informed - http://www.ukultimate.com/staying-informed
