Hi,
Cezar has left the following comment at Determine why solids.sh fails on
64-bit http://www.google-melange.com/gci/task/view/google/gci2012/7982217:
Cause
The bug seems to be here, in regress/tgms/solids.mged. If I remove these
three lines, I get the same number of "off by many" on both 64- and 32-bit.
I guess I'll have to squint at librt/primitives/eto/eto.c for a while to
fix this.
in eto.s eto 64 0 32 0 0 1 12 0 12 24 4
r eto.ru eto.s
mater eto.r "plastic {sp .4 di .9}" 155 155 255 0
Greetings,
The Google Open Source Programs Team
---
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to Determine why
solids.sh fails on 64-bit.
To stop receiving these messages, go to:
http://www.google-melange.com/gci/task/view/google/gci2012/7982217.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122912
_______________________________________________
BRL-CAD Tracker mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-tracker
