Hi,
Cezar has left the following comment at Determine why solids.sh fails on
64-bit http://www.google-melange.com/gci/task/view/google/gci2012/7982217:
Big logs
I've run rt with the -X flag and I get one 120 MB file for each platform.
What I've noticed is that the correct one has three more lines than the
32-bit one, and I don't think this is a coincidence. I think that if I find
those three lines, I'll know where the problem comes from, only they are
very big (2.5 mil) and I don't know what I should be looking for. Another
thing I've noticed is this difference related to a eto.s, the last number
is one value less in the 32-bit version. I'm not sure if such differences
are expected, but I think they are relevant.
color (0.0254081, 0.0254081, 0.0418004)
color (0.0254081, 0.0254081, 0.0418003)
Greetings,
The Google Open Source Programs Team
---
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to Determine why
solids.sh fails on 64-bit.
To stop receiving these messages, go to:
http://www.google-melange.com/gci/task/view/google/gci2012/7982217.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_123012
_______________________________________________
BRL-CAD Tracker mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-tracker
