Collin Funk <[email protected]> writes: > Any objections? Or is this change okay?
+1 I wish the script was more flexible to handle the maintainer easily specifying which hashes to include, but pending someone who implements that (which seems like work, and maybe only for very narrow purpose), I don't think we should block SHA1 -> SHA3-256. /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
