Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> writes: > Collin Funk <[email protected]> writes: > >> Any objections? Or is this change okay? > > +1 > > I wish the script was more flexible to handle the maintainer easily > specifying which hashes to include, but pending someone who implements > that (which seems like work, and maybe only for very narrow purpose), I > don't think we should block SHA1 -> SHA3-256.
That sounds like a nice feature to me. One of us can have a look at adding it in a different patch. Collin
