On 23/11/2025 13:05, Pádraig Brady wrote:
BTW it's tempting to use tagged format in the above to simplify things for users, and also avoid FAILED messages for mixed checksum input. I.e.:Here are the SHA256 and SHA3-256 checksums: SHA256 (coreutils-9.9.35-cf973.tar.gz) = tWYsM2przwPj1p9c1T0noDxRKTFixSWmZX5tzPZ6cW8= SHA3-256 (coreutils-9.9.35-cf973.tar.gz) = FgV2UuDSv+U3Ud9fdSA5mWRGQYZ9CAKx3wYCHiTm3Ls= SHA256 (coreutils-9.9.35-cf973.tar.xz) = BkhqCaxeKIT51WtP73fuja5ekZYb4DDhPzh88ux2glo= SHA3-256 (coreutils-9.9.35-cf973.tar.xz) = bD/kFhX/O1uQ9ciHUQygPa8YyotTBrmsV5Do+49yAV8= Verify the base64 SHA256 checksums with cksum --check from coreutils-9.2 or OpenBSD's cksum since 2007. Also verify the base64 SHA3-256 checksums with cksum --check from coreutils-9.9.
Actually the above line would then more accurately be: Also verify the SHA3-256 checksums with cksum --check from coreutils-9.8 cheers, Padraig
