Great work -- looks good to me, so +1 to commit. Collin Funk <[email protected]> writes:
> File: coreutils-9.9.42-b1ccb.tar.gz > SHA256 sum: > e25ec3ccd2358e101ad76dd97c1cf27a6bb80b987c4692564ee7524fd8429785 > SHA3-256 sum: > 5b2ac1a5dc943e28ece021cb6c0874cd0a9790b13c3845718d52282a12205731 Why not use base64 format for SHA3-256 here? Is there any tool that support SHA3-256 and not base64 encoded hashes? It would be nice to migrate to base64 encoded hashes for brevity. I think Bruno argued for hex encoded SHA256 hashes, but IIRC the argument was that not all SHA256 tools supported base64 format. /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
