Collin Funk <[email protected]> writes: > Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> writes: > >> Great work -- looks good to me, so +1 to commit. >> >> Collin Funk <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> File: coreutils-9.9.42-b1ccb.tar.gz >>> SHA256 sum: >>> e25ec3ccd2358e101ad76dd97c1cf27a6bb80b987c4692564ee7524fd8429785 >>> SHA3-256 sum: >>> 5b2ac1a5dc943e28ece021cb6c0874cd0a9790b13c3845718d52282a12205731 >> >> Why not use base64 format for SHA3-256 here? Is there any tool that >> support SHA3-256 and not base64 encoded hashes? >> >> It would be nice to migrate to base64 encoded hashes for brevity. I >> think Bruno argued for hex encoded SHA256 hashes, but IIRC the argument >> was that not all SHA256 tools supported base64 format. > > It looks like it is only supported by GNU Coreutils and OpenBSD. I don't > see any mention of base64 support in FreeBSD or NetBSD's man pages for > cksum, sha256sum, etc.
Do FreeBSD/NetBSD support SHA3-256? If you can't verify SHA3-256 you probably won't care if the string you cannot verify is in hex or base64. Looks like not: https://man.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=sha256sum&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+16.0-CURRENT&arch=default&format=html https://man.netbsd.org/cksum.1 /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
