Your email says: "I'm trying to force-load a module using 'insmod -f'"
On 9/24/07 3:41 PM, "Evert Meulie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eehh, that is exactly what I did. My command was: > > insmod -f bs.ko > (bs.ko was present in the current directory) > > > This returned: > > insmod: -f.ko: no module by that name found > > > Regards, > Evert > > > Stephen Beaver wrote: >> You need to provide the module name. - insmod -f keyspan' to force >> installation of he keyspan.ko module for example. >> >> >> On 9/24/07 1:37 PM, "Evert Meulie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> I'm having some minor problems with insmod/busybox 1.4.2. I'm trying to >>> force-load a module using >>> 'insmod -f' >>> >>> When I try this on the system, I get: >>> >>> insmod: -f.ko: no module by that name found >>> >>> . >>> That would suggest the insmod version does not support this parameter. >>> So then I tried 'insmod' and >>> I get: >>> >>> BusyBox v1.4.2 (2007-09-13 12:57:14 CEST) multi-call binary >>> >>> Usage: insmod [OPTION]... MODULE [symbol=value]... >>> >>> Load the specified kernel modules into the kernel >>> >>> Options: >>> -f Force module to load into the wrong kernel version >>> -k Make module autoclean-able >>> -v Verbose output >>> -q Quiet output >>> -L Lock to prevent simultaneous loads of a module >>> -o NAME Set internal module name to NAME >>> -x Do not export externs >>> >>> So it looks like '-f' is supported anyway...? >>> >>> >>> >>> Greetings, >>> Evert >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> busybox mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > busybox mailing list > [email protected] > http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
