Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 September 2007, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>> On Monday 24 September 2007 22:58, Evert Meulie wrote:
>>> But we're diverting here... Am I the only one who has this problem with
>>> insmod?
>> If I understand it right, 2.6-style insmod has no options at all.
>
> correct, insmod on linux-2.6 takes no options, so there is no way (by design)
> to "force" loading of a module
>
> there's probably a good reason it failed to load :P
> -mike
The one and only reason is a mismatch in version magic...
Regards,
Evert
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
