On Monday 24 September 2007 22:58, Evert Meulie wrote: > Yes, just like someone would say 'I am trying to compile a program with > gcc'... > > The name of the module is not relevant in my case, so I only listed the > command and the parameter. > > Anyway. 'insmod -f' should NEVER give 'insmod: -f.ko: no module by that > name found' as error. Without the module listed, it should give > something like 'Usage: insmod [options] filename'. > > But we're diverting here... Am I the only one who has this problem with > insmod?
If I understand it right, 2.6-style insmod has no options at all. I fixed help text to not list options in this case. -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
