On Tuesday 25 September 2007, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > On Monday 24 September 2007 22:58, Evert Meulie wrote: > > But we're diverting here... Am I the only one who has this problem with > > insmod? > > If I understand it right, 2.6-style insmod has no options at all.
correct, insmod on linux-2.6 takes no options, so there is no way (by design) to "force" loading of a module there's probably a good reason it failed to load :P -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
