Yes, just like someone would say 'I am trying to compile a program with 
gcc'...

The name of the module is not relevant in my case, so I only listed the 
command and the parameter.

Anyway. 'insmod -f' should NEVER give 'insmod: -f.ko: no module by that 
name found' as error. Without the module listed, it should give 
something like 'Usage: insmod [options] filename'.

But we're diverting here... Am I the only one who has this problem with 
insmod?


Regards,
        Evert



Stephen Beaver wrote:
> Your email says: 
> 
> "I'm trying to force-load a module using
> 'insmod -f'"
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 9/24/07 3:41 PM, "Evert Meulie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> Eehh, that is exactly what I did. My command was:
>>
>> insmod -f bs.ko
>> (bs.ko was present in the current directory)
>>
>>
>> This returned:
>>
>> insmod: -f.ko: no module by that name found
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Evert
>>
>>
>> Stephen Beaver wrote:
>>> You need to provide the module name. - insmod -f keyspan' to force
>>> installation of he keyspan.ko module for example.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/24/07 1:37 PM, "Evert Meulie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi!
>>>>
>>>> I'm having some minor problems with insmod/busybox 1.4.2. I'm trying to
>>>> force-load a module using
>>>> 'insmod -f'
>>>>
>>>> When I try this on the system, I get:
>>>>
>>>> insmod: -f.ko: no module by that name found
>>>>
>>>> .
>>>> That would suggest the insmod version does not support this parameter.
>>>> So then I tried 'insmod' and
>>>> I get:
>>>>
>>>> BusyBox v1.4.2 (2007-09-13 12:57:14 CEST) multi-call binary
>>>>
>>>> Usage: insmod [OPTION]... MODULE [symbol=value]...
>>>>
>>>> Load the specified kernel modules into the kernel
>>>>
>>>> Options:
>>>>         -f      Force module to load into the wrong kernel version
>>>>         -k      Make module autoclean-able
>>>>         -v      Verbose output
>>>>         -q      Quiet output
>>>>         -L      Lock to prevent simultaneous loads of a module
>>>>         -o NAME Set internal module name to NAME
>>>>         -x      Do not export externs
>>>>
>>>> So it looks like '-f' is supported anyway...?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Greetings,
>>>> Evert
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> busybox mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> busybox mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Reply via email to