> > > So your MTA INcorrectly discards that EHLO. > no. I think it was my postfix's reject_invalid_hostname option that > rejected the email address in the EHLO.
In either case it is MTA, not BB sendmail client, problem, agreed? We should probably not even complain. Need to support MAIL FROM: <> as > others said. Yes. It should use it verbatim. <off>Let spammers employ BB sendmail more actively ;)))</off> > > bash so I changed it to SMTPHOST. > > Personally, I would get completely rid of environ here. -H switch is > > good, > So using a env var was an cheap way to get away from having a config > file. I see. Makes sense. > and localhost is the sane fallback IMO. > If you use busybox sendmail, then I'm pretty sure you dont have a real > MTA listening on localhost port 25. (because if you do have postfix > running then you use the postfix sendmail and not busybox sendmail) Actually when I developed sendmail I used to have XMail on localhost :) That is where this default is from. But I would not object if we had no default host at all. So would you rediff and send the result? Regards, -- Vladimir
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
