> > It fixes this error that i currently get from postfix: > 501 5.5.2 <natanael.copa?gmail.com>: Helo command rejected: Invalid name
Sorry, Natanael, why is the question mark in the middle of the name?! if there is no attatchement then the input is converted to an > "attatchment". Makes sense if you really want attatchment support as you > then can treat all parts equally more or less. You've got the idea. By treating all parts equally we reduce code size and improve maintenance-ability. That would be great. Support for attatchemnt is higly nonstandard and > should be an configure option. > ... > Isn't that a job for the script/program that creates the message in > first place? sendmails job is to send mails. not compose them, nor edit > them. That is why a zillion of loosely coded scripts are needed to just send an email. I consider attachments support as a good intrinsic feature. > 2) Plain '.' in message: message body needs to be analyzed and > > mangled. > ssmtp solves that by inserting an '.' in front of all lines starting > with '.' Not big deal, but the message IS then mangled. And it is a pain to send cyrillic text in plain. What to do with that if vanilla sendmail knew nothing beyond ASCII 0-127 chars? > But why doesn't the remote end correctly process well-packed MIME > > messages?! > Because recepient is a stupid program. (gnats) Can we somehow say them they are gNUTs :^) I'd like to have a sendmail that just sends mail and don't bother whats > in there. Well, I'll make FEATURE_SENDMAIL_BE_DUMB then. That said, I will try my best. Regards, -- Vladimir
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
