>
> > So would you rediff and send the result?

I meant your EHLO patch.

I started look at it, but it looks like sendmail is designed to only do
> attatchments and attatchments only.


Not true.
And we could inhibit encoding unless an attachment(s) is present.
The problems still are: 1) plain text should be 7-bit clean; I assure you
there are people who can not afford that.
2) Plain '.' in message: message body needs to be analyzed and mangled.

But why doesn't the remote end correctly process well-packed MIME messages?!


I think I will have to go back to ssmtp which does what I need: stupidly
> send plain text emails, not
> attatchments.


Pity.

I don't have time for a busybox sendmail rewrite or fundamental redesign.


I do. Please, request for features and find time to test the changes.

--
Vladimir
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Reply via email to